Interesting results — but perhaps not totally incompatible with what I found. “God has revealed” and “studies have shown” both imply an acceptance of the authority in question and a belief in that which has been revealed/shown. Your phrases do not. “Studies have shown” is used to present something as a established fact, but “scientists say” often has overtones of “or so the Germans would have us believe.” (Who is more likely to say “Scientists say people evolved from lower animals,” a believer in evolution or a skeptic?) Religious believers and skeptics can both say “the Bible says,” but “God has revealed” implies a belief in actual revelation.
Very interesting stuff.
I followed your link back and started messing around with it a little myself. I found something of a contrapositive:
http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=The+Bible+says%2C+Scientists+say&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3
Interesting results — but perhaps not totally incompatible with what I found. “God has revealed” and “studies have shown” both imply an acceptance of the authority in question and a belief in that which has been revealed/shown. Your phrases do not. “Studies have shown” is used to present something as a established fact, but “scientists say” often has overtones of “or so the Germans would have us believe.” (Who is more likely to say “Scientists say people evolved from lower animals,” a believer in evolution or a skeptic?) Religious believers and skeptics can both say “the Bible says,” but “God has revealed” implies a belief in actual revelation.
Pingback: Some notes on the dark arts of rhetoric | Bugs to fearen babes withall