“No surplus words or unnecessary actions,” says Marcus Aurelius. “No random actions, none not based on underlying principles.” It’s an appealing principle by which to live, but in the end I always give it up because it itself seems random and unnecessary. It’s a principle of poetry, not ethics — and there’s something very unpoetic about a life lived consciously as poetry.
Recent comments
- Damon on Low-gravity dreams evoke “real” memories
- prince7717 on Low-gravity dreams evoke “real” memories
- senexada on Fifteen translations of Dante compared
- November 2019 Astro & Tarot Forecast – Natali Nicole on Why Waite switched Justice and Strength
- Wm Jas on German dominance at the very highest levels of accomplishment
Popular posts
Archives
- April 2018 (1)
- February 2015 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (8)
- August 2014 (6)
- July 2014 (11)
- June 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (3)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (14)
- April 2013 (6)
- March 2013 (17)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (7)
- November 2012 (11)
- October 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (3)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (3)
- September 2011 (3)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (8)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (6)
- November 2010 (2)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (3)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (15)
- May 2009 (24)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (1)
- December 2003 (1)
Boisterous beholding · A blog by Wm Jas Tychonievich
Actually life lived as any art form seems exhausting and unnecessary to me. I enjoy isolated moments of living theater, drama, and poetry in my life, but every day all day… that would be horrible, I think.
It is Curioius that that all of The Deadly Sins
Envy, Gluttony, Greed, Lust, Pride ( Vanity ), Sloth, Wrath
Are all expressions of Surplus.
And while UnNecessary Actions may exhaust ones breakfast,
There is something Pragmatic to be said for Extending a Margin of Error to Every Endeavor.
Dante (in his Purgatorio) considers only Lust, Gluttony, and Avarice to be sins of excess, and he also considers them to be the least serious of the seven. Next is Sloth, which is obviously a sin of insufficiency rather than excess. The worst sins of all are Wrath, Envy, and Pride, which Dante considers to be perversions of love rather than excesses or insufficiencies. In other words, Lust, Gluttony, and Avarice are too much of a good thing; Sloth is too little; but Wrath, Envy, and Pride are just fundamentally bad things, wrong for qualitative rather than quantitative reasons.
I’m not endorsing Dante’s analysis, just throwing it out there as a counterpoint to yours. Sloth in particular is hard to see as being an expression of surplus; a surplus of inactivity is an odd sort of surplus.
It’s started to wear on me that i’m always being so argumentative,
i really want to be supportive and i wouldn’t be ‘here’ if i didn’t thoroughly enjoy your rants & missives,
But i am clinging tenaciously to the idea of all sins being rooted in surplus.
My analysis of this is that All these Attributes are points along a series of continuums
in which one side of the continuum is :
An Overwrought Self Indulgence of Sacrifice & Penance,
While The Middle Region is The Modest Truly Virtuous Proposal made by Buddhist Pragmatists,
And The Far Extremium is The Damnable Mortal Sin.
Each End is A Surplus of A Specific Property,
The Middle Heart is A Blending of These Two Excesses.
( ??? )
Apathetic Indifference / A Quiet Fondness* / Perversity of Possessive Lust
Hysterical Religious Fasting / Healthy Appetite / Obese Gluttony
Zen Denial of Materialism / Caretaker Ownership / Blind Avarice
Frantic Ruinous Industry / The Pursuit of Self Actualization / The Indolence of Torpidity
Naive Contentment / A Sensible Understanding of Human Nature / The Fury of Wrath
Unquestioning Obedience, Respect & Admiration / Acquiescent Contentedness / Covetous Envy
Suicidal Loathing / Self Respect or Dignity / Delusional Narcissistic Arrogance
– – –
The Quiet Fondness surpasses The Delusional Romantic Love which is A Manifestation of Stringy Pheromones & Chemical Receptors. People often ‘Fall’ in & out of Love, But a Quiet Fondness will endure all the foibles of age & circumstances.
Chrs, what you’re describing is Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean — that both surplus and deficiency are vice, while virtue is a happy medium. That seems inconsistent with your statement that all sin is surplus.
I don’t personally find Aristotle’s model of virtue to be the most useful. By trying to make everything into a continuum, it masks some important qualitative differences.